101,000 Americans Killed last Year By Our Insurance-driven Healthcare

This is one of those updates on the movement for guaranteed healthcare that is difficult to write, both in terms of the gravity of the situation, and the need for Washington to act accordingly.

The numbers are staggering, and barely made it into the US media: 101,000 Americans died preventable deaths last year due to our insurance industry-dominated health care system, according to a new study by the respected Commonwealth Fund.

That is shocking, lobbyist-induced genocide.

The good news is that, despite the best efforts of the insurance industry and their Washington allies, the movement towards guaranteeing healthcare on a Medicare for All or "single-payer" model is clearly strengthening.  The latest advocates?  Doctors, who just this decade have joined nurse, in solidly supporting Universal Medicare, a fact which will fundamentally alter healthcare politics.  

Back to the Commonwealth Fund.  I challenge anyone reading this data to argue for the retention of for-profit insurers in our healthcare system:

The U.S. now ranks last out of 19 countries on a measure of mortality amenable to medical care, falling from 15th as other countries raised the bar on performance. Up to 101,000 fewer people would die prematurely if the U.S. could achieve leading, benchmark country rates.

In other words, the insurance industry, which has a death grip on healthcare system, does so at the cost of 101,000 American lives per year.

By comparison, that's more than colon and breast cancer combined.

The system is collapsing...

As of 2007, 75 million working-age adults (42%) were either uninsured or underinsured, a sharp increase from 61 million (35%) in 2003. More than one-third (37%) of all U.S. adults reported going without needed care because of costs in 2007, versus only 5 percent in the benchmark country..... Much of this growth comes from the ranks of the middle class.

Just as more Americans are being financially constrained by it...

By 2007, two of five adults (41%) reported they had medical debt or problems with medical bills, up from 34 percent in 2005.

Before we look further, absorb these numbers and realize why America's RNs cannot, will not, and are not compromising to protect a role for the insurance industry.  Middle of the road solutions will not address these grave problems...no more than withdrawing some of the trops in Iraq would the Iraq War.  The solution is obvious, because we have reams of data from dozens of other countries supporting it; what we need now is more political will.  HR 676 by John Conyers has 91 co-sponsors.  Is your Rep one of them?

Nurses have long been leading proponets for a genuine healthcare solution.  They are now joined by doctors, reports Roger Bybee, the American Prospect's excellent healthcare reporter:

The latest sign is a poll published recently in the Annals of Internal Medicine showing that 59 percent of U.S. doctors support a "single payer" plan that essentially eliminates the central role of private insurers. Most industrial societies -- including nations as diverse as Taiwan, France, and Canada -- have adopted universal health systems that provide health care to all citizens and permit them free choice of their doctors and hospitals. These plans are typically funded by a mix of general tax revenues and payroll taxes, and essential health-care is administered by nonprofit government agencies rather than private insurers.

The new poll, conducted by Indiana University's Center for Health Policy and Professionalism Research, shows a sharp 10 percent spike in the number of doctors supporting national insurance: 59 percent in 2007 compared to 49 percent five years earlier.  This indicates that more physicians are eager for systematic changes, said Toledo physician Dr. Johnathon Ross, past president of Physicians for a National Health Program.

"What this means is the usual bloc of anti-reform is breaking up," he told The Toledo Blade. "These doctors are looking in the eyes of sick [uninsured] patients every day."

Remember that the AMA defeated the original bill for Universal Medicare, back in 1948, when Harry Truman re-introduced Franklin Roosevelt's dream.  To their shame the AMA is currently headed by an insurance exec...but they have clearly lost their ability to speak on behalf of doctors on this issue.

And for those who don’t think genuine healthcare reform is possible… [http://www.projo.com/business/content/JO_JOBBLOG713_07-13-08_FRAQ0EI_v11.17e4a29.html business consultancy Challenger, Gray and Christmas]

predicts U.S. companies, desperate to shed burgeoning health-care costs, will join a movement to eliminate employer-paid health benefits and create a national, single-payer alternative. disagrees, and advises their HR customers to get planning for single-payer.

Watch this space for more info on upcoming rallies and protests for guaranteed healthcare!



Display:


Re: 101,000 Americans Killed last Year By Our Insu (none / 0)

That last quote is the key one. When business gets behind a single-payer system it will happen quite quickly. Anerican manufacturing companies are getting killed by health care costs. This is the single biggest change that could help them become more competitive.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 05:40:17 PM EST

Re: 101,000 Americans Killed last Year By Our Insu (none / 0)

I honestly don't understand why the auto companies aren't leading the charge on this.  I've seen documents from the Canadian divisions talking about how much better the business environment is up there due to predictable healthcare costs.  Ideology, I guess???


Join the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee to fight for guaranteed, single-payer healthcare: www.GuaranteedHealthcare.org/blog
by California Nurses Shum on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 06:22:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 101,000 Americans Killed By Health Care (none / 0)

That Commonwealth Fund report is a must-read. Here are some choice excerpts with emphasis added:

Even more troubling, the U.S. health system is on the wrong track. Overall, performance has not improved since the first National Scorecard was issued in 2006. Of greatest concern, access to health care has significantly declined. As of 2007, more than 75 million adults--42 percent of all adults ages 19 to 64--were either uninsured during the year or underinsured, up from 35 percent in 2003. At the same time, the U.S. failed to keep pace with gains in health outcomes achieved by the leading countries. The U.S. now ranks last out of 19 countries on a measure of mortality amenable to medical care, falling from 15th as other countries raised the bar on performance. Up to 101,000 fewer people would die prematurely if the U.S. could achieve leading, benchmark country rates

That's over 100,000 real lives lost because of lack of health care. No disrespect to our military, but the loss of American lives in Iraq pales in comparison to this preventable loss of lives back at home.

The U.S. spends twice per capita what other major industrialized countries spend on health care, and costs continue to rise faster than income. We are headed toward $1 of every $5 of national income going toward health care. We should expect a better return on this investment.

Performance on measures of health system efficiency remains especially low, with the U.S. scoring 53 out of 100 on measures gauging inappropriate, wasteful, or fragmented care; avoidable hospitalizations; variation in quality and costs; administrative costs; and use of information technology. Lowering insurance administrative costs alone could save up to $100 billion a year at the lowest country rates.

There is no disputing that the U.S. needs universal health care now. It will help our economy and save lives. We're paying twice what other countries pay and getting way worse results. $100 billion a year is being lost to administrative costs. With 42% of the non-Medicare people uninsured or underinsured, that means the 58% of us that are insured are covering the costs for everyone. Our current system is not fair to anyone, ends up costing too much and has terrible results. The time has come for universal health care.

(This is a repeat of my comments in another diary about the Commonwealth Fund report, but health care diaries don't get the attention they should so I'm reposting it.)


by LakersFan on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 06:39:46 PM EST

Thank you and amen... (none / 0)

As I was reading the report, I felt like the data was too big to even be able to comprehend, if that makes any sense.  (What is 101,000 lives?)


Join the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee to fight for guaranteed, single-payer healthcare: www.GuaranteedHealthcare.org/blog
by California Nurses Shum on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 07:12:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 101,000 Americans Killed last Year By Our Insu (none / 0)

Far too many people resist single-payer, because they already have insurance and are afraid they will be giving something up. The sad truth is that their current insurance is probably inadequate for a real health crisis. The number of families forced into bankruptcy because of medical bills has been rising steadily. I have had personal experience with this.

My fiancee had a $1,000,000 lifetime cap on her insurance. During her 12 month illness, she went through more than $2,000,000 in bills. The estate is still going through probate. The hospital and doctors submitted $1,500,000 in unpaid bills.

She is no longer here and doesn't have to face losing everything she worked her whole life to get. Other families aren't in that situation. If one person gets sick the whole family is affected by a bankruptcy.

I wish people would wake up to the fact that, even if they are insured under the current system, they are one serious illness away from losing everything.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 06:53:50 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.